In a move that could reshape the rhythm and strategy of men’s college basketball, the NCAA Men’s Basketball Rules Committee has made a noteworthy recommendation: further exploration of shifting from two 20-minute halves to four 10-minute quarters. The proposal, while still in discussion stages, could bring the men’s game in line with the format used by the NBA, women’s college basketball, and nearly every major basketball league around the world.

Why Now?

The idea isn’t new. Coaches, analysts, and fans have debated the halves-versus-quarters structure for years. But with the women’s college game already making the transition in 2015—and seeing improved pace and fan engagement—the men’s side is once again taking a serious look.

According to the committee, the current discussion is driven by several key factors:

• Game Flow and Strategy: Quarters allow for more natural stoppages, helping manage fouls and fatigue. They also eliminate the “double bonus” situation in the latter part of halves, replacing it with two free throws after the fifth team foul in each quarter—standard in the NBA and WNBA.

• Consistency Across Levels: From FIBA to high school, the majority of basketball is played in quarters. Adopting the format would align men’s college basketball with the global and professional standards, which could aid in player development and fan experience.

• Commercial Viability: More quarter breaks provide more opportunities for television timeouts and ad revenue, something that matters to networks and the NCAA alike.

Resistance to Change

While the benefits may seem obvious to some, not everyone is ready to embrace the shift.

Traditionalists argue that the two-half format is one of the defining features of men’s college basketball—something that separates it from the professional game and adds a layer of unique strategy, especially when managing end-of-half momentum.

Coaches also have mixed opinions. While some favor the strategic reset quarters provide, others worry about how additional breaks might disrupt flow or benefit deeper, more athletic teams.

Trial and Error

The NIT and some early-season tournaments have already experimented with rule changes, including quarter-based play. Results have been mostly positive, with improved pacing, fewer long delays due to foul accumulation, and better overall game management.

It’s possible that the NCAA will again test the quarter format in select tournaments before pushing for a full adoption. Any official change would not take place before the 2025–26 season at the earliest.

What’s Next?

The committee emphasized that this is a recommendation for further study, not a rule change. Still, it's a strong signal that the tide may finally be turning. With the women’s game thriving under quarters and international basketball unified under the same model, pressure is mounting for the men’s side to adapt.

If implemented, the shift could be one of the most visible and impactful rule changes in decades—modernizing the game while potentially improving flow, strategy, and marketability.

Whether fans and coaches will embrace it remains to be seen. But one thing is clear: the halves-versus-quarters debate is heating up again—and this time, change may be closer than ever.